Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1593188
 
 

Footnotes (65)



 


 



A Planet by Any Other Name...


Kimberly Kessler Ferzan


University of Virginia, School of Law

April 20, 2010

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 108, No. 6, 2010

Abstract:     
Scientific discoveries about Pluto and the rest of the universe led scientists to question Pluto’s status and ultimately to strip Pluto of its standing among planets. Neil deGrasse Tyson’s The Pluto Files masterfully weaves together the empirical, conceptual, and cultural questions surrounding Pluto’s demotion. The problem, for scientists and spectators alike, was this: there was no scientific definition of planet. This review systematizes the Pluto puzzle presented in the book and reveals its relevance for law. The questions presented by The Pluto Files – how man relates to the world, how man understands its conceptual categories, and how man should create distinctions along a continuum – are as relevant for the legal theorizing on Earth as they are for scientists’ understandings of space.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 21, 2010 ; Last revised: May 28, 2010

Suggested Citation

Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler, A Planet by Any Other Name... (April 20, 2010). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 108, No. 6, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1593188

Contact Information

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan (Contact Author)
University of Virginia, School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 521
Downloads: 90
Download Rank: 173,512
Footnotes:  65

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds