A Planet by Any Other Name...
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
University of Virginia, School of Law
April 20, 2010
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 108, No. 6, 2010
Scientific discoveries about Pluto and the rest of the universe led scientists to question Pluto’s status and ultimately to strip Pluto of its standing among planets. Neil deGrasse Tyson’s The Pluto Files masterfully weaves together the empirical, conceptual, and cultural questions surrounding Pluto’s demotion. The problem, for scientists and spectators alike, was this: there was no scientific definition of planet. This review systematizes the Pluto puzzle presented in the book and reveals its relevance for law. The questions presented by The Pluto Files – how man relates to the world, how man understands its conceptual categories, and how man should create distinctions along a continuum – are as relevant for the legal theorizing on Earth as they are for scientists’ understandings of space.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 21, 2010 ; Last revised: May 28, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds