Footnotes (148)



Documentation, Documentary, and the Law: What Should be Made of Victim Impact Videos?

Regina Austin

University of Pennsylvania Law School

April 18, 2010

Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 31, p. 979, 2010
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-19

Since the Supreme Court sanctioned the introduction of victim impact evidence in the sentencing phase of capital cases in Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991), there have been a number of reported decisions in which that evidence has taken the form of videos composed of home-produced still photographs and moving images of the victim. Most of these videos were first shown at funerals or memorial services and contain music appropriate for such occasions. This article considers the probative value of victim impact videos and responds to the call of Justice John Paul Stevens, made in a statement regarding the rejection of certiorari in People v. Kelly, 129 S.Ct. 564 (2008), for the articulation of reasonable limits on the admission of victim impact evidence.

The first part of the article offers an analysis of victim impact videos drawing on the lessons of cinema studies and cultural studies. The common reception of home photographs and moving images affects the interpretation of victim impact videos. As a result, impact videos are typically too idealistic and idyllic to be really probative evidence of the victims’ individuality and the impact of their loss on their families and friends. However, impact videos may be particularly important evidence for the members of devalued or denigrated groups who fall outside of generally accepted images of ideal victims. The second part of the article deals with an actual case in which the subject of the video was a young Latina mother, felled by domestic violence, whose character was attacked as part of the effort to mitigate her husband’s sentence. He wound up with a judgment of life without the possibility of parole. Here the article considers how the victim impact video might have been more probative and the response of the defense to it, more likely to produce a less harsh punishment. Part three finds greater relevance in a video streamed on YouTube that was based on the written impact statement presented by the young adult son of a homicide victim at the perpetrator’s first parole hearing which was held some 15 years after the murder. Finally, the conclusion offers recommendations for the admission of victim impact videos.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: victim impact evidence, victim’s rights, death penalty, sentencing, domestic violence, capital punishment, Payne v. Tennessee, visual legal advocacy, video evidence, law and film

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 22, 2010 ; Last revised: June 22, 2010

Suggested Citation

Austin, Regina, Documentation, Documentary, and the Law: What Should be Made of Victim Impact Videos? (April 18, 2010). Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 31, p. 979, 2010; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 10-19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1593611

Contact Information

Regina Austin (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,670
Downloads: 216
Download Rank: 97,630
Footnotes:  148

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds