Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1593648
 
 

Footnotes (389)



 


 



What's in a Name?: The Role of Danielson in the Taxation of Credit Card Securitizations


Grace Soyon Lee


University of Alabama - School of Law

April 5, 2010

Baylor Law Review, Vol. 62, p. 110, 2010
University of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1593648

Abstract:     
While the doctrine of substance over form has been a part of tax law for over seventy years, courts look disfavorably upon taxpayers who invoke the doctrine to argue against the forms of their own transactions under what is commonly referred to as the Danielson rule. Although the Danielson rule appears sound on its face, it holds less force when applied outside of its original context. In particular, the Danielson rule should not apply when the form given to a transaction is given for non-tax reasons, such as to achieve a particular accounting treatment. The taxation of credit card securitizations provides a particularly acute example of how the Danielson rule could lead taxing authorities to erroneously base the taxation of a transaction on its form for accounting purposes. In this article, I explain why the Danielson rule should not apply to credit card securitizations. First, I describe how credit card securitizations are structured and how they are treated under both the accounting and the tax rules. I then explain the origins and purposes of the Danielson rule, why it should not apply to credit card securitizations, and how it could adversely affect their taxation if applied. By expressly excluding from the scope of the Danielson rule those transactions where the difference between substance and form is rooted in the difference between the accounting and tax regimes, the government will clarify a currently muddled area of law and provide greater certainty to participants in credit card securitizations and similar transactions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: Tax, Credit Card, Securitization, Danielson, Disavowal, Accounting, Substance-Form, Strong Proof, Debt, Equity

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 21, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Lee, Grace Soyon, What's in a Name?: The Role of Danielson in the Taxation of Credit Card Securitizations (April 5, 2010). Baylor Law Review, Vol. 62, p. 110, 2010; University of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1593648. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1593648

Contact Information

Grace Soyon Lee (Contact Author)
University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 911
Downloads: 109
Download Rank: 151,999
Footnotes:  389

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds