|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id1593760. ; Size: 169K
|
|
Review of Ngaire Naffine, Law’s Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and The Legal Person
Bryan Thomas affiliation not provided to SSRN
April 21, 2010
Abstract:
In Law’s Meaning of Life, Ngaire Naffine pursues the question, ‘Who is Law For?’. In this critical review, I argue that the question is ill-formed, as the law’s conception the person rightly varies from one context to another. I further argue that answering questions about the nature of persons would not help us to resolve pressing ethical and legal dilemmas. Naffine portrays a variety of prominent theorists (e.g., Ronald Dworkin, Peter Singer, John Finnis) as disagreeing incommensurably on the nature of personhood. I challenge her reading of these thinkers, showing, inter alia, that Dworkin eschews theorization about personhood, and that Singer wishes to extend moral and legal consideration to non-persons. In so doing, I show that their views are commensurable.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: April 26, 2010
Suggested CitationThomas, Bryan, Review of Ngaire Naffine, Law’s Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and
The Legal Person (April 21, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1593760 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1593760
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|