Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1594382
 


 



Lawrence v. Texas: A Case for Cautious Optimism Regarding Procreative Liberty


Katheryn D. Katz


Albany Law School

September 1, 2004

Women's Rights Law Reporter, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2004

Abstract:     
While the Supreme Court has set forth that there is a right to non-reproductive sex, there has never been a clear proclamation setting forth a right to non-sexual procreation through assisted reproductive technologies (ARTS). However, an exploration of the rights carved out by Lawrence v. Texas decision delivers reasons for optimism that such rights do exist. The article focuses on the Court’s acceptance of four concepts: the Court’s revitalization of substantive due process rights as a source of productive rights; Court’s acceptance of the principle that moral objections cannot serve as the basis of secular laws, in certain cases; the Court suggested that international human rights norms are a source of persuasive authority in interpreting American laws; the Court’s implication as to the value of same-sex relationships.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 23, 2010 ; Last revised: May 1, 2010

Suggested Citation

Katz, Katheryn D., Lawrence v. Texas: A Case for Cautious Optimism Regarding Procreative Liberty (September 1, 2004). Women's Rights Law Reporter, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1594382

Contact Information

Katheryn D. Katz (Contact Author)
Albany Law School ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 139
Downloads: 8

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds