The Jena Six and the History of Racially Compromised Justice in Louisiana
Gabriel J. Chin
University of California, Davis - School of Law
Harvard Civil Rights - Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 44, p. 361, 2009
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 10-14
This symposium contribution paper puts the story of the Jena Six, young African American men charged with attempted murder for a schoolyard fight, in the larger context of Louisiana legal history. It argues that Louisiana has historically discriminated against its African American citizens through vaguely drafted laws that could be applied with almost unlimited discretion. These included laws allowing registrars to deny voting registration to applicants who failed to satisfactorily interpret particular sections of the state or U.S. Constitution, and a vagrancy law, still on the books, allowing arrest of "Persons found in or near any structure, movable, vessel, or private grounds, without being able to account for their lawful presence therein." Given this history, unlimited prosecutorial discretion has predictable effects.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Keywords: Jena Six, Louisiana, Voting Rights, Equal Protection, Vagrancy
JEL Classification: K14, K4Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 26, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.797 seconds