Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1596272
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The Irony of Securities Arbitration Today: Why Do Brokerage Firms Need Judicial Protection?


Barbara Black


affiliation not provided to SSRN

May 1, 2010

University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 415, 2003
U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 10-20

Abstract:     
In 1987 the securities industry achieved a major victory. Until then, because of the Supreme Court's 1953 holding in Wilko v. Swan that agreements to arbitrate federal securities claims contained in customer agreements were unenforceable, customers could sue brokerage firms and their salespersons in court, frequently before juries amenable to sizable verdicts, including punitive damages.

Illustrating a classic example of “be careful what you wish for,” brokerage firms no longer find arbitration entirely to their liking. Increasingly they turn to the courts to resist arbitration, to interfere with ongoing arbitration, or to undo the results of arbitration.

Unfortunately, both federal and state courts are becoming increasingly involved in the securities arbitration process to the detriment of investors. This Article argues that increased judicial involvement in the securities arbitration process is unwarranted. Although there are legitimate concerns about the use of arbitration to resolve consumer and employment disputes in lieu of litigation, the arbitration process fares well when measured by the components identified as necessary for a fair arbitration. To the extent there are issues about the fairness of the arbitration forums, it is the investor, not the brokerage firm or brokers, who has reason to be concerned.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: securities, arbitration, judicial involvement

JEL Classification: K22, K29, K41, K49

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 27, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Black, Barbara, The Irony of Securities Arbitration Today: Why Do Brokerage Firms Need Judicial Protection? (May 1, 2010). University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 415, 2003; U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 10-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1596272

Contact Information

Barbara Black (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,141
Downloads: 60
Download Rank: 219,060
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.329 seconds