Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1596685
 
 

Footnotes (104)



 


 



Defending Disclosure in Software Licensing


Robert A. Hillman


Cornell Law School

Maureen A. O'Rourke


Boston University School of Law

April 27, 2010

Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 010-008

Abstract:     
For lack of our imagination, this article does not have the most scintillating title. However, the subject matter is critically important. We survey prominent kinds of disclosures in law and show why the disclosure tool, though subject to substantial criticism, is central to the legitimacy of any legal regime. Our working example is the American Law Institute’s “Principles of the Law of Software Contracts” (hereinafter “ALI Principles”).

The ALI Principles include three kinds of disclosure: disclosure of facts (concerning the quality of software), disclosure of terms (of standard forms), and disclosure of post-contract intentions (to pursue remote disablement of software). We take each up respectively in the three sections that follow and show how these forms of disclosure promote important social values and goals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: disclosure, Internet, software, licensing

JEL Classification: law and economics

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 28, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Hillman, Robert A. and O'Rourke, Maureen A., Defending Disclosure in Software Licensing (April 27, 2010). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 010-008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1596685 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1596685

Contact Information

Robert A. Hillman (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-4902 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)
Maureen A. O'Rourke
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-3123 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 829
Downloads: 109
Download Rank: 154,206
Footnotes:  104
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.375 seconds