Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1596835
 
 

Footnotes (411)



 


 



Colonial Cartographies, Postcolonial Borders, and Enduring Failures of International Law: The Unending War along the Afghanistan-Pakistan Frontier


Tayyab Mahmud


Seattle University School of Law - Center for Global Justice

October 15, 2010

Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2010
Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 10-11

Abstract:     
Many of today's pervasive and intractable security and nation-building dilemmas issue from the dissonance between the prescribed model of territorially bounded nation-states and the imprisonment of postcolonial polities in territorial straitjackets bequeathed by colonial cartographies. With a focus on the Durand Line, the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan and the epicenter of the prolonged war in the region, this article explores the enduring ramifications of the mutually constitutive role of colonialism and modern law. The global reach of colonial rule reordered subjects and reconfigured space. Fixed territorial demarcations of colonial possessions played a pivotal role in this process. Nineteenth century constructs of international law, geography, geopolitics, and the frontier, fashioned in the age of empire, were interwoven in the enabling frame that made the drawing of colonial borders like the Durand Line possible. Imperatives of colonial rule and compulsions of imperial rivalries positioned these demarcations that often cut across age-old cultural and historical social units. Postcolonial states inherited these demarcations and, with them, a host of endemic political and security afflictions. Modern international law, which in its incipient state lent license to colonial rule, today legitimates colonial cartographies, thereby accentuating postcolonial dilemmas of nation-building and territorial integrity. By freeze-framing inherited colonial borders, international law forces disparate people to circumscribe their political aspirations within predetermined territorial bounds, precluding political and territorial arrangements in tune with their aspirations. To silence the questions that rise from colonial territorial demarcations, international law raises the specter of disorder. It seeks to preserve order, even an unjust and dysfunctional one. In the process, international law betrays a deeper affliction that plagues it - its refusal to squarely face its complicity in colonial domination accentuates its inability to resolve today's international disputes procreated by colonial cartographies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 80

Keywords: Afghanistan, Borders, Cartography, Colonialism, Durand Line, Frontier, Geography, Imperialism, India, International Law, Pakistan, Postcolonial, Taliban, Unequal Treaties

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 28, 2010 ; Last revised: November 29, 2011

Suggested Citation

Mahmud, Tayyab, Colonial Cartographies, Postcolonial Borders, and Enduring Failures of International Law: The Unending War along the Afghanistan-Pakistan Frontier (October 15, 2010). Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2010; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 10-11. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1596835

Contact Information

Tayyab Mahmud (Contact Author)
Seattle University School of Law - Center for Global Justice ( email )
901 12th Avenue, Sullivan Hall
P.O. Box 222000
Seattle, WA n/a 98122-1090
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,367
Downloads: 289
Download Rank: 60,654
Footnotes:  411

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.329 seconds