Footnotes (118)



Easterbrook on Academic Freedom

Aziz Z. Huq

University of Chicago - Law School

April 28, 2010

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2010
University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 306

Does the First Amendment to the US Constitution protect a distinct notion of “academic freedom?” Of late, courts and commentators have cast doubt on an individual First Amendment right of academic freedom. When federal courts have directed friendly attention to the matter, the result has been bromidic endorsement with scant analytic heft. The goal of this Essay is to identify an organizing principle for a constitutional jurisprudence of academic freedom. It could find inspiration in recent jurisprudence of Judge Frank Easterbrook. His cases invite a strategy of judicial protection of academic freedom by ensuring that legal or governmental action neither displaces, nor excessively burdens, the professoriat’s free exercise of professional judgment. The resulting constitutional norm of academic freedom would be an exercise in Burkean minimalism - aspiring to preserve a professional culture our society values and protects through constitutional precommitment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 28, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Huq, Aziz Z., Easterbrook on Academic Freedom (April 28, 2010). University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 4, 2010; University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 306. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1597293

Contact Information

Aziz Z. Huq (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 448
Downloads: 66
Download Rank: 234,651
Footnotes:  118

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.313 seconds