Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1597407
 
 

References (18)



 
 

Citations (4)



 


 



Selling Confession: Setting the Stage with the ‘Sympathetic Detective with a Time-Limited Offer’


Deborah Davis


University of Nevada, Reno

Richard A. Leo


University of San Francisco - School of Law

William C. Follette


University of Nevada, Reno

April 1, 2010

Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Forthcoming
Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2010-29

Abstract:     
The effectiveness of an interrogation tactic dubbed the “sympathetic detective with a time limited offer” was tested. Participants read two versions of an interrogation transcript, with and without the tactic. Those who read the sympathetic detective version believed the detective had greater authority to determine whether and with what to charge the suspect, more beneficent intentions toward the suspect, and viewed confession as more wise. However, regression analyses indicated that for innocent suspects, only perceptions of the strength of evidence against the suspect and the detective’s beneficence and authority predicted the perceived wisdom of false confession. Interrogation tactics were generally effective, as indicated by participant recommendations of confession (versus invoking Miranda, denial, or continuing to talk without admitting guilt) for both innocent (16.7%) and guilty (74.4%) suspects; and reasons offered for participants’ recommendations for confession versus other choices generally conformed to those reported by real-life confessors and interrogation scholars.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: interrogation, false confession, sympathy, authority, beneficence

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 28, 2010 ; Last revised: December 6, 2010

Suggested Citation

Davis, Deborah and Leo, Richard A. and Follette, William C., Selling Confession: Setting the Stage with the ‘Sympathetic Detective with a Time-Limited Offer’ (April 1, 2010). Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Forthcoming; Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2010-29. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1597407

Contact Information

Deborah Davis (Contact Author)
University of Nevada, Reno ( email )
Reno, NV 89557
United States
Richard A. Leo
University of San Francisco - School of Law ( email )
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
William C. Follette
University of Nevada, Reno ( email )
Reno, NV 89557
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 692
Downloads: 107
Download Rank: 144,052
References:  18
Citations:  4

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.547 seconds