Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1597803
 


 



Advice for Owners of Contaminated Land after Meghrig V. KFC Western, Inc.


Jerome M. Organ


University of St. Thomas - School of Law (Minnesota)

November 1996

Environmental Law Reporter, Vol. 26, p. 10582, Nov. 1996

Abstract:     
In its decision in Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc., the United States Supreme Court concluded that section 7002(a)(1)(B) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act does not authorize private parties to recover cleanup costs associated with contaminated land, but only authorizes injunctive relief. This means owners of contaminated land must choose whether to seek injunctive relief under RCRA or cost recovery action under CERCLA or state common law or statutory claims. This article analyzes and critiques the Meghrig decision and discusses how owners of contaminated land should evaluate and decide among the options available to them for seeking relief.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: RCRA, CERCLA, contaminated land, cost recovery

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Organ, Jerome M., Advice for Owners of Contaminated Land after Meghrig V. KFC Western, Inc. (November 1996). Environmental Law Reporter, Vol. 26, p. 10582, Nov. 1996. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1597803

Contact Information

Jerome M. Organ (Contact Author)
University of St. Thomas - School of Law (Minnesota) ( email )
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 287
Downloads: 21

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds