Marcia L. McCormick
Saint Louis University - School of Law
March 9, 2010
Saint Louis University Legal Studies Research Paper, 2010-09
Calls for increased regulation are flying fast and furious these days. We use regulation in the United States to prevent harm that various kinds of activities might cause and also to create positive external benefits that those activities could yield, but might not without incentives. Most regulatory programs in the United States provide a blend of measures designed to create these positive external benefits, promote good practices in the industry, prevent harms, and provide those harmed with remedies. At a time in which we contemplate new ways to regulate to deal with the crises of the day and prevent the crises of tomorrow, this article seeks to explore one piece of the regulatory solution: adjudication. Adjudication is used both to deter harmful behavior and to remedy harmful behavior engaged in. And it is used in a variety of contexts.
To explore how we might construct agencies with greater adjudicatory power, I will use the regulation of equal employment opportunity as a case study. This article explains the weaknesses of the current system to enforce the anti-discrimination laws and outlines a proposal for what an adjudicative agency designed to maximize the benefits from an agency perspective would look like. The paper goes on to analyze the limits article III may place on the structure of adjudicating agencies and ways those limits might be overcome.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: Enforcement, Title VII, Separation of Powers, Legislative Courts, Adr, Agencies, Administrative Law, Adjudication, Discrimination, Courts
JEL Classification: K19, K23, K39, K41, K42working papers series
Date posted: April 30, 2010 ; Last revised: May 27, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds