Martha Nussbaum, Essentialism, and Human Sexuality
Carlos A. Ball
Rutgers Law School
February 1, 2010
Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2010
Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Paper No. 077
The type of liberal humanism defended by Martha Nussbaum can be criticized as “essentialist” because it is grounded in commonalities, found across time and place, which allow us to recognize each other as human. I argue in this Essay, however, that Nussbaum’s writings on sex and sexuality are entirely consistent with social constructionist (as opposed to essentialist) understandings of sexual orientation. I also explain why Nussbaum’s liberal humanism, which encourages us to recognize the humanity of those who seem least like us, is a compelling form of argumentation on behalf of sexual minorities.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Date posted: May 3, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.469 seconds