Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1599759
 
 

Footnotes (194)



 


 



Temporal Imperialism


Alison L. LaCroix


University of Chicago Law School

May 3, 2010

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 158, 2010
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 308

Abstract:     
Issues of time and temporality pervade American constitutional adjudication, at both a doctrinal and a broader, structural level. The doctrinal issue concerns the extent to which judicial decisions operate forward, backward, or some combination of both across time. The structural issue concerns the related and overarching question of how the Supreme Court, as a court, operates in time, and the temporal division of authority between courts and legislatures. In both contexts, the Supreme Court is an actor in time. This Article examines the Court’s treatment of temporal issues through three case studies: (1) a pair of early decisions in which the Court confronted both the transition from the colonial to the republican constitutional regime, and the temporal scope of legislative acts; (2) the Court’s twentieth-century doctrine on adjudicative retroactivity; and (3) the recent case of Grutter v. Bollinger, in which the Court’s temporal imperialism led it to claim ever-greater power to define the relevant timeframe for antidiscrimination law. The Court’s institutional self-presentation suggests that it is immortal and therefore not temporally bound, and that claim of continuity typically extends to its decisions. But the causal flow from institutional to doctrinal continuity sometimes breaks down. Perhaps not surprisingly, these moments of disjunction tend to arise when the Court chooses to allow them to. Even in situations that call into question the continuity of a particular doctrine, therefore, the Court remains master of time in that it as an institution determines when and how the façade of doctrinal continuity is to be breached.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: retroactivity, time, temporal effect, judicial review, prospectivity, legislative review

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2010  

Suggested Citation

LaCroix, Alison L., Temporal Imperialism (May 3, 2010). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 158, 2010; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 308. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1599759 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599759

Contact Information

Alison LaCroix (Contact Author)
University of Chicago Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 895
Downloads: 220
Download Rank: 80,170
Footnotes:  194

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.313 seconds