Abstract

 


 



The High Court's Agenda: More Interesting than it First Appears


Rebecca Gill


University of Nevada, Las Vegas

April 16, 2010


Abstract:     
At first glance, the High Court of Australia’s agenda looks relatively dull. It reports few cases, and only a small proportion of these cases are what American legal observers might consider interesting. Under the surface, however, hides an active docket of cases that drive policy innovation and reflect social change. By examining the many layers of the High Court’s docket in terms of its institutional context, this paper shows that the High Court’s agenda is far more interesting than it first appears. The Court is much busier than its reported decisions indicate and, because of the nature of the Australian Constitution and the High Court’s institutional design, the foundationally important cases are tucked in amongst cases dealing with government regulation, non-constitutional criminal cases and even torts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: High Court of Australia, agenda, workload

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Gill, Rebecca, The High Court's Agenda: More Interesting than it First Appears (April 16, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1599823 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599823

Contact Information

Rebecca Gill (Contact Author)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas ( email )
4505 S. Maryland Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
HOME PAGE: http://faculty.unlv.edu/rwood
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 341
Downloads: 52
Download Rank: 198,978

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.390 seconds