The Federal Circuit and the D.C. Circuit: Comparative Trials of Two Semi-Specialized Courts
John M. Golden
The University of Texas at Austin - School of Law
May 1, 2010
George Washington Law Review, Vol. 78, pp. 553-574, 2010
U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 173
A string of reversals by the Supreme Court of the United States has helped create an impression that the patent jurisprudence of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is under siege. But the experience of another semi-specialized court of appeals, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, suggests that such Supreme Court intervention is likely to be less than cataclysmic. In the 1970s and 1980s, the Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit in administrative law cases with a ferocity that makes the Court’s present-day interventions in patent law look timid. Despite the onslaught, however, much of the D.C. Circuit’s work survived. The D.C. Circuit’s experience thus suggests at least two lessons that might extend to the Federal Circuit today: first, Supreme Court intervention does not necessarily prevent a semi-specialized circuit from putting a strong stamp on an area of relative expertise; and second, even when Congress has created a semi-specialized circuit, spates of Supreme Court scrutiny and reversal might be essentially inevitable and possibly even desirable.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23working papers series
Date posted: May 10, 2010 ; Last revised: May 13, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds