Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1600379
 


 



Trekking Toward Über Regulation: Prospects for Meaningful Change at SEC Enforcement?


Douglas M. Branson


University of Pittsburgh School of Law

May 3, 2010

University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 545, 2010
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-17

Abstract:     
Whether used in analysis of Senator Christopher Dodd’s, the administration’s, or anyone else’s regulatory reform proposals, a phrase often heard in Washington, D.C., is über regulation. Large, or very large, (über) regulators of banks and financial institutions are thought to be necessary for at least three reasons. First, large financial institutions (Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citigroup) need to counterbalanced with large, all powerful regulators. Second, broad (large) grants of subject matter jurisdiction are necessary to eliminate possibilities for regulatory arbitrage which currently exist (banks, for example, may be able to chose from among the Office of Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve, or various state’s departments of banking or financial institutions as their principal regulator). Third, only an über regulator would have the overview to detect and the powers to curb unacceptable levels of systemic risk which may lurk over the horizon from time to time. This article recounts some of those arguments, also documenting the downside of über regulation, such as loss of historic camaraderie and high morale in certain smaller regulatory agencies such as the SEC.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: SEC, regulatory reform, uber regulation, financial institutions, banks, regulation, systemic risk, subject matter jurisdiction

JEL Classification: G21, G24, G28, K23

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Branson, Douglas M., Trekking Toward Über Regulation: Prospects for Meaningful Change at SEC Enforcement? (May 3, 2010). University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 545, 2010; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1600379

Contact Information

Douglas Branson (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
412-624-3437 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 595
Downloads: 81
Download Rank: 180,986

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.360 seconds