Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1601615
 


 



Different Shades of Bias: Skin Tone, Implicit Racial Bias, and Judgments of Ambiguous Evidence


Justin D. Levinson


University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law

Danielle Young


University of Hawaii at Manoa - Department of Psychology

May 6, 2010

West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 112, pp. 307-350, 2010

Abstract:     
Many commentators and judges have come to accept the changing reality of racial discrimination - discrimination that has largely shifted from overt and intentional to covert and unintentional. Despite this scholarly progress, the dearth of empirical studies testing implicit bias within the legal system is surprising. In an effort to begin filling the empirical research gap, this Article proposes and tests a new hypothesis called Biased Evidence Hypothesis. Biased Evidence Hypothesis posits that when racial stereotypes are activated, jurors automatically and unintentionally evaluate ambiguous trial evidence in racially biased ways. Because racial stereotypes in the legal context often involve stereotypes of African-Americans and other minority group members as aggressive criminals, Biased Evidence Hypothesis, if confirmed, could help explain the continued racial disparities that plague the American criminal justice system.

To test Biased Evidence Hypothesis, we designed an empirical study that tested how mock-jurors judge trial evidence. As part of an “evidence slideshow” in an armed robbery case, we showed half of the study participants a security camera photo of a dark-skinned perpetrator and the other half of the participants an otherwise identical photo of a lighter-skinned perpetrator. We then presented participants with evidence from the trial, and asked them to judge how much each piece of evidence tended to indicate whether the defendant was guilty or not guilty. The results of the study supported Biased Evidence Hypothesis and indicated that participants who saw a photo of a dark- skinned perpetrator judged subsequent evidence as more supportive of a guilty verdict compared to participants who saw a photo of a lighter-skinned perpetrator.

We consider the results of the empirical study not only as part of a discussion implicit racial bias in the legal system, but also as part of an amplification of the Story Model of decision-making. This model, which provides a step-by-step explanation of how jurors make decisions, has yet to consider the potentially pervasive impact of implicit racial bias in decision-making. Using the Story Model as a guide and considering the study results together with other emerging research on implicit bias, we deconstruct the multitude of ways that implicit racial bias can affect jury decision-making.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: Implicit Racial Bias, Priming, Evidence Evaluation, Story Model, Decision-Making, Social Cognition

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 10, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Levinson, Justin D. and Young, Danielle, Different Shades of Bias: Skin Tone, Implicit Racial Bias, and Judgments of Ambiguous Evidence (May 6, 2010). West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 112, pp. 307-350, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1601615

Contact Information

Justin D. Levinson (Contact Author)
University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law ( email )
2515 Dole Street
Honolulu, HI 96822
United States
Danielle Young
University of Hawaii at Manoa - Department of Psychology ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,865
Downloads: 274
Download Rank: 62,290
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds