Retributivism Refined - Or Run Amok?

Kenneth W. Simons

University of California, Irvine School of Law; Boston University - School of Law

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 77
Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 10-11

What would the criminal law look like if we took retributivist principles very seriously? In their book, Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law, the authors - Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, with contributions by Stephen J. Morse - provide a controversial set of answers. Whether a criminal act does or does not result in harm should not affect the actor’s punishment. Only the last act of risk creation should suffice for liability. Conscious awareness of risk should always be necessary. And all of criminal law, each and every category of mens rea and actus reus, should be reduced to a single idea: “Do not be reckless; do not knowingly take risks that are clearly unjustifiable in light of your reasons for taking those risks.” Few scholars and even fewer legislators will be persuaded. Nevertheless, the authors have written an engaging, lively, philosophically astute book of remarkable breadth, depth, and originality.

In this book review, I first point out that, to some extent, the authors are consequentialists in retributivist clothing. Turning to the authors’ analysis of recklessness, I investigate two critical questions: Can recklessness really suffice as the sole criterion of culpability? (The answer, alas, is no.) And, is their requirement of “conscious awareness” of risk too demanding? (Indeed it is.) In the last section, I address a surprising phenomenon, the reappearance of the reasonable person as a central requirement of their culpability criterion, notwithstanding their unequivocal rejection of the reasonable person as part of a criterion of liability for culpable inadvertence to risk. I then critique that reincarnation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: Crime, Criminal law, Desert, Reckless, Recklessness, Negligence, Retribution, Retributive, Retributivism, Culpability, Punishment, Mens REA

JEL Classification: K13

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 17, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Simons, Kenneth W., Retributivism Refined - Or Run Amok?. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 77; Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 10-11. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1601910

Contact Information

Kenneth W. Simons (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
401 E. Peltason Dr.
Room 3800H
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
Boston University - School of Law
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,353
Downloads: 167
Download Rank: 118,933

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds