Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1602183
 
 

Footnotes (40)



 


 



Stone & Rolls Ltd V Moore Stephens: An Unnecessary Tangle


David Halpern


affiliation not provided to SSRN


Modern Law Review, Vol. 73, Issue 3, pp. 487-493, May 2010

Abstract:     
The opinions of the minority risk creating a dangerous inroad into Salamon and Caparo. The opinions of the majority avoid that risk but reach the right result by tortuous reasoning. The answer to the case lies in a proper application of Caparo.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Accepted Paper Series





Date posted: May 10, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Halpern, David, Stone & Rolls Ltd V Moore Stephens: An Unnecessary Tangle. Modern Law Review, Vol. 73, Issue 3, pp. 487-493, May 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1602183 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00795.x

Contact Information

David Halpern (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 283
Downloads: 2
Footnotes:  40

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds