Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604606
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (178)



 


 



Gene Concepts, Gene Talk, and Gene Patents


Andrew W. Torrance


University of Kansas - School of Law


Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 157-191, 2010

Abstract:     
Since the existence of a discrete unit of heredity was first proposed by Gregor Mendel, scientific concepts of the “gene” have undergone rapid evolution. Beyond obvious epistemic and operational importance to the scientific community, changing gene concepts have exerted strong effects on institutions such as medicine, the biotechnology industry, politics, and the law. A particularly rich example of this is the interplay between gene concepts and patent law. Over the last century, biology has elaborated gene concepts that variously emphasized genes as discretely material, genes as information, and genes as extremely complex. By contrast, patent law has steadily adhered to a simpler, more stable concept of the gene since the advent of gene patents in the late 1970s. In fact, while the biology community has increasingly engaged in vigorous internal debate regarding the gene’s complexity and uncertainty, it has tended simultaneously to emphasize the simplicity and certainty of the gene to constituencies outside the biology community, most notably the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Federal courts. Rather than allow gene concepts to become contested by constituencies outside biology, the biology community appears to have used its authority to maintain a portrayal of the gene that facilitates the appropriation of rents from genes through the patent system. This use of “gene talk” has undergirded the growth of biotechnology into a powerful industry that has economically rewarded investors, academic institutions, and biologists. Not only may gene talk have facilitated the patenting of genes, but the prominence of gene patents describing a relatively simpler gene concept may have fed back into biological science to promote a simpler, and more patentable, concept of the gene even among members of the biology community.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Gene, Patent, Gene Patent, Patent Law, Gene Talk, DNA, DNA Patent, Biotechnology, Biotechnology Patent, Biotechnology Patent Law, History of Science, Science And Technology Studies

JEL Classification: K10, K11, K19, K20, K21, K23, K29, K30, K32, K39, L12, L41, L43, L65, O14, O31, O31

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 14, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Torrance, Andrew W., Gene Concepts, Gene Talk, and Gene Patents. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 157-191, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604606

Contact Information

Andrew W. Torrance (Contact Author)
University of Kansas - School of Law ( email )
Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,972
Downloads: 394
Download Rank: 41,806
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  178

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.343 seconds