The Right to Speak, the Right to Hear, and the Right Not to Hear: The Technological Resolution to the Cable/Pornography Debate
Michael I. Meyerson
University of Baltimore - School of Law
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Vol. 21, No. 1 & 2, 1987/1988
The advent of cable television presented a new opportunity to consider the competing interests on each side of the free speech/pornography debate. This Article attempts to construct an analysis that will be consistent with Supreme Court teaching on how government, under the first amendment, may constitutionally regulate legal obscenity, particularly in the name of protecting those who wish to avoid exposure to such material.
The Article shows how, unlike earlier battles over technology and pornography, cable television presented the novel opportunity to have a technological rather than a censorial solution to this difficult problem.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 64
Keywords: Cable TV, Pornography, Supreme Court, First Amendment, Government Regulation, Indecency, Obscenity, Freedom of Speech, Censorship
JEL Classification: K19, K29, K39, K49, L82Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 11, 2010
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds