The Stories We Tell: Intentional Harm and the Quest for Insurance Funding

Ellen S. Pryor

UNT Dallas College of Law


Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 1721, 1997

Tort plaintiffs sometimes “underlitigate” – that is, they plead and prove negligence rather than or in addition to intentional tort theories when, absent insurance coverage considerations, the case would be framed solely as an intentional tort claim or would emphasize the intentional tort. This article examines underlitigating, taking into account how it relates to other pieces of the complex tort liability insurance regime. Although underlitigating is undesirable for several reasons, it is to some degree an inevitable result of insurance and tort doctrines that find powerful justification in both efficiency and justice rationales. However, it is possible to minimize underlitigating by modifying certain insurance-related doctrines.

Keywords: liability insurance, intentional tort, tort law, professional responsibility

JEL Classification: K13, K41

Not Available For Download

Date posted: May 12, 2010 ; Last revised: August 20, 2010

Suggested Citation

Pryor, Ellen S., The Stories We Tell: Intentional Harm and the Quest for Insurance Funding (1997). Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 1721, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604834

Contact Information

Ellen S. Pryor (Contact Author)
UNT Dallas College of Law ( email )
1901 Main Street
Dallas, TX 75201
United States
(214) 752-5959 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.untsystem.edu
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 492

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.156 seconds