The Stories We Tell: Intentional Harm and the Quest for Insurance Funding
Ellen S. Pryor
UNT Dallas College of Law
Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 1721, 1997
Tort plaintiffs sometimes “underlitigate” – that is, they plead and prove negligence rather than or in addition to intentional tort theories when, absent insurance coverage considerations, the case would be framed solely as an intentional tort claim or would emphasize the intentional tort. This article examines underlitigating, taking into account how it relates to other pieces of the complex tort liability insurance regime. Although underlitigating is undesirable for several reasons, it is to some degree an inevitable result of insurance and tort doctrines that find powerful justification in both efficiency and justice rationales. However, it is possible to minimize underlitigating by modifying certain insurance-related doctrines.
Keywords: liability insurance, intentional tort, tort law, professional responsibility
JEL Classification: K13, K41working papers series
Date posted: May 12, 2010 ; Last revised: August 20, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds