Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604922
 
 

Footnotes (241)



 


 



Captive Regulators, Captive Shippers: The Legacy of Mccarty Farms


Anthony Johnstone


University of Montana School of Law

August 2009

Montana Law Review, Vol. 70, p. 239, 2009

Abstract:     
Thirty years ago, Congress reoriented the Interstate Commerce Commission to protect railroads in addition to shippers. Part I of this article describes the circumstances behind this regulatory shift and the regime it produced. Part II explains both the development and failure of the new regime in a case brought by a group of Montana wheat and barley farmers, McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Burlington Northern, Inc. Part III describes the termination of the Commission and the attempts of the newly created Surface Transportation Board to correct the regulatory failure of McCarty Farms. Part IV explains the impact of the new regime on railroads and grain shippers, and discusses procedural lessons from McCarty Farms that may guide future reforms of the Surface Transportation Board and other regulatory institutions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Regulated Industries, Interstate Commerce Commission, Surface Transportation Board, Railroads, Agriculture

JEL Classification: K23, L92

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 10, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Johnstone, Anthony, Captive Regulators, Captive Shippers: The Legacy of Mccarty Farms (August 2009). Montana Law Review, Vol. 70, p. 239, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604922

Contact Information

Anthony Johnstone (Contact Author)
University of Montana School of Law ( email )
Missoula, MT 59812-0002
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.umt.edu/LAW/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 436
Downloads: 33
Footnotes:  241

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds