Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1605287
 
 

Footnotes (454)



 


 



The Supreme Court’s Increased Attention to the Law of Lawyering: Mere Coincidence or Something More?


Renee Newman Knake


Michigan State University - College of Law

May 12, 2010

American University Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 1499, 2010
MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-10

Abstract:     
The United States Supreme Court considered seventeen cases raising issues related to the role of attorneys and the practice of law during the 2009 Term. This body of cases represents a substantial departure from dockets in recent history, where typically the Court took up less than a handful of cases involving regulation of the legal profession. While some might consider the increased number of cases addressing the law of lawyering a mere coincidence, this article contends that something more is occurring. The Court’s decision to devote so much of its limited time to these matters is noteworthy not only for the individual issues resolved, but also for the cases’ existence, indeed dominance, on the docket.

This article is the first to present a comprehensive overview of the Supreme Court’s newest lawyering cases. Broadly speaking, the cases fall into two categories: access to sound lawyering and protection from bad lawyering. The first group of cases addresses access to legal advice, questioning First Amendment protection of attorney advice and advertising, the application of fee-shifting statutes to encourage legal representation for meritorious cases, and the availability of an immediate appeal to preserve attorney-client privilege in the face of a court order to disclose protected materials. The second group of cases involves harms caused by lawyers. These cases include prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel claims where a criminal defense attorney lacks the requisite experience, offers insufficient mitigation evidence during sentencing, delivers a poor closing argument, gives faulty advice, misses an essential filing deadline, or fails to request a limiting instruction.

Part I of this article examines the cases individually and highlights the ways each case presents critical issues related to the practice of law and the regulation of lawyers. Part II turns to a collective reading of the cases, reflecting on the Court’s heightened interest in affairs of the legal profession, and suggesting insights that might be drawn by viewing these cases as part of a larger picture, rather than standing alone. Though the full measure of these cases’ impact on professional responsibility jurisprudence will be realized only with the passing of time, this article offers three preliminary observations. First, when read together, the cases reveal a troubling pattern of limits on access to legal advice as well as harms caused by bad lawyering. Second, the cases offer fundamental lessons for those involved in future regulation of the legal profession. Third, the cases illustrate the importance of constitutional considerations to the field of lawyer ethics.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 76

Keywords: supreme court, law of lawyering, legal ethics, lawyer ethics, professional responsibility, constitutional law

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 13, 2010 ; Last revised: October 31, 2010

Suggested Citation

Knake, Renee Newman, The Supreme Court’s Increased Attention to the Law of Lawyering: Mere Coincidence or Something More? (May 12, 2010). American University Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 1499, 2010; MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1605287

Contact Information

Renee Newman Knake (Contact Author)
Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )
318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 898
Downloads: 155
Download Rank: 113,420
Footnotes:  454

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds