Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1605353
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Comparative Fault and Insurance Bad Faith


Ellen S. Pryor


UNT Dallas College of Law

1994

Texas Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 1505, 1994

Abstract:     
This Article examines the topic of comparative fault in insurance bad faith settings. In the 1980s and 90s, most states adopted a tort or extracontractual remedy for insurer bad faith in first-party or third-party insurance contexts. Courts and scholars now have begun to consider whether to adopt a comparative fault defense for the insured’s own conduct. The Article explores whether a comparative fault defense is even necessary. As it turns out, the case for the defense is more complicated and less compelling that one might at first expect. A comparative fault defense would not displace contract defenses; rather, it would be an overlay on those defenses. Thus, the comparative defense warrants adoption only if its marginal benefits outweigh the marginal costs of adding a tort defense to contract defenses that will be relevant in any event. This comparison varies depending on the shape of a jurisdiction’s bad faith doctrine. For instance, a comparative defense is not warranted when bad faith, though termed a “tort,” essentially allows only damages that fit a contract model. In addition, the case for a comparative defense is weak when the insured’s ability to recover for bad faith is closely linked to the insured’s ability to recover on the contract; in such cases, the contract defenses would capture most insured conduct that would be relevant to the bad faith claim. The Article then discusses a number of unsettled or unexplored issues about how a comparative fault defense should operate if a jurisdiction adopts it. These issues include coordinating the comparative fault defense with contract defenses, and applying the comparative defense in multi-party and multi-theory claims.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: insurance, first-party insurance, liability insurance, bad faith, comparative fault

JEL Classification: K13, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 13, 2010 ; Last revised: August 8, 2010

Suggested Citation

Pryor, Ellen S., Comparative Fault and Insurance Bad Faith (1994). Texas Law Review, Vol. 72, p. 1505, 1994. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1605353

Contact Information

Ellen S. Pryor (Contact Author)
UNT Dallas College of Law ( email )
1901 Main Street
Dallas, TX 75201
United States
(214) 752-5959 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.untsystem.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 396
Downloads: 35
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.265 seconds