Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1608564
 


 



Yes, Thankfully, Euclid Lives


Charles M. Haar


Harvard Law School

Michael Allan Wolf


University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law

2004

Fordham Law Review Vol. 73, pp. 771-787, 2004

Abstract:     
Professors Haar and Wolf reiterate their endorsement of Progressive jurisprudence, as embodied in the Supreme Court's opinion in Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., despite Professor Eric Claeys's effort to expose the political theory underlying Progressive legal thought. They highlight problems with Professor Claeys's portrayal of the actual practice of zoning and with his use of history, problems that seriously undercut Professor Claeys's findings regarding the political beliefs of early zoning and planning advocates, the evolution of zoning law in the courts, and the role natural law played in American legal history.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: Regulatory Takings, Euclid v. Ambler, Zoning, Progressivism, Zoning, Planning

JEL Classification: K11

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 16, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Haar, Charles M. and Wolf, Michael Allan, Yes, Thankfully, Euclid Lives (2004). Fordham Law Review Vol. 73, pp. 771-787, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1608564

Contact Information

Charles M. Haar
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Michael Allan Wolf (Contact Author)
University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
352-273-0934 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/wolf/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 208
Downloads: 19

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.265 seconds