Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1609468
 
 

References (83)



 


 



Post-Adversarial and Post-Inquisitorial Justice: Transcending Traditional Penological Paradigms


Arie Freiberg


Monash University - Faculty of Law

2010

Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010/17

Abstract:     
Criminal justice systems are under constant strain. Rising case loads, crowded court dockets, growing prison populations and high recidivism rates have resulted in growing frustration with systems which have been criticized as being expensive, out of date, complex, unfair, slow and lacking regard to victims of crime and to the public generally. One consequence of these criticisms has been a search for different and innovative methods of dealing with crime and associated social problems.

In a number of common law countries, theories and practices of restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence have developed, creating more inclusive, optimistic and positive frameworks for justice systems and transforming the ways in which public and private dispute resolution systems are conceived of and operate. In these jurisdictions, the growth of interest in different modes of dispute resolution reflects a deep disenchantment with the traditional, confrontational techniques that are inherent in the common law adversarial system. Though therapeutic jurisprudence and restorative justice are the best-known of such theories, they are not the only ones to have been developed, articulated and practiced. Others, including appropriate dispute resolution, comprehensive law, creative problem solving, holistic law, problem-solving courts, managerial justice and multi-door courthouse theory have been influential in shaping public policy and legal education.

The purpose of this paper is to suggest that many of these innovations could be considered by inquisitorial systems, albeit with due regard to the historical, political and cultural differences between the two systems. It argues that adversarial and inquisitorial justice systems should transformed rather than hybridized, hence the terms ‘post-adversarial’ and ‘post-inquisitorial’ justice.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: Criminal Justice, Non-adversarial Justice, Alternative Criminal System

JEL Classification: K00, K1, K14, K4, K40, K41, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 18, 2010 ; Last revised: July 22, 2013

Suggested Citation

Freiberg, Arie, Post-Adversarial and Post-Inquisitorial Justice: Transcending Traditional Penological Paradigms (2010). Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010/17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1609468

Contact Information

Arie Freiberg (Contact Author)
Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,237
Downloads: 313
Download Rank: 51,878
References:  83

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.344 seconds