|
||||
|
||||
Executive Compensation Restrictions: Do they Restrict Firms’ Willingness to Participate in TARP?Brian D. CadmanUniversity of Utah - David Eccles School of Business Mary Ellen CarterBoston College - Department of Accounting Luann J. LynchUniversity of Virginia - Darden School of Business July 15, 2012 Cadman, B., Carter, M. E. and Lynch, L. J. (2012), Executive Compensation Restrictions: Do They Restrict Firms’ Willingness to Participate in TARP?. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Forthcoming Abstract: We examine the implications of regulatory intervention in pay-setting, by studying whether executive compensation restrictions associated with the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) influence banks’ participation in the program. We find that banks more likely to be impacted by the restrictions are less likely to participate in TARP. Among banks accepting funds, we find that the likelihood of repaying before the end of 2009 is positively related to CEO incentive compensation. We find greater subsequent executive turnover and lower pay increases in banks accepting funds, consistent with concerns about talent drain. We also find that proxies for self-serving behavior are related to declining funds, suggesting pay preservation as a potential motive. Despite the motives behind declining funding, we find no evidence that the restrictions limited the objectives of TARP based on banks’ financial health or lending and may have allowed the government to allocate funds more effectively.
Keywords: Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), financial institutions, executive compensation JEL Classification: G21, G28, G32, G34, G38, J33 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 19, 2010 ; Last revised: October 23, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.406 seconds