Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1611865
 
 

Footnotes (218)



 


 



Preserving Human Potential as Freedom: A Framework for Regulating Epigenetic Harms


Fazal Khan


University of Georgia Law School

May 1, 2010

Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, Forthcoming
UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-08

Abstract:     
Epigenetics is a rapidly evolving scientific field of inquiry examining how a wide range of environmental, social, and nutritional exposures can dramatically control how genes are expressed without changing the underlying DNA. Research has demonstrated that epigenetics plays a large role in human development and in disease causation. In a sense, epigenetics blurs the distinction between “nature” and “nurture” as experiences (nurture) become a part of intrinsic biology (nature). Remarkably, some epigenetic modifications are durable across generations, meaning that exposures from our grandparents’ generation might affect our health now, even if we have not experienced the same exposures. In the same vein, current exposures could affect the health of not only individuals currently living but also future generations. Given the relative novelty of epigenetics research and the multifactorial nature of human development and disease causation, it is unlikely that conclusive proof can be established showing that particular exposures lead to epigenetic risks that manifest into specific conditions. Using the Capabilities Approach (“CA”) developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, this article argues that epigenetic risk is not merely a medical issue, but that it more generally implicates the underlying fairness and justice of our social contract. For instance, how we develop mentally or physically has a tremendous impact upon our inherent capabilities and our set of life options. The CA prompts us to ask questions such as: (1) what impact do particular epigenetic risks have on our ability to exercise free choices; (2) are these risks avoidable; and (3) how are these risks distributed across society? Due to the complex nature of epigenetic risk, tort law is predictably incapable of addressing this harm. Further, while regulatory agencies possess the statutory authority to begin addressing epigenetic harms, currently these agencies are not attuned to measure or to respond to this type of harm. This article argues that it is imperative to initiate a regulatory framework to address epigenetic risk from specific substances even if conclusive proof of disease causation cannot be established. Shifting the burden of generating epigenetic risk data to producers of suspected harmful substances serves as a start. As information concerning epigenetic risks accrues, the regulatory response should evolve concurrently. As part of a dynamic policy-making approach our goals need to encompass the following: (i) promotion of knowledge in the scientific, legal, and public domains; (ii) assessment and modification of current regulations to address preventable risk; and (iii) an overarching commitment to protect human capabilities in an equitable manner.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 77

Keywords: Epigenetics, capabilities, risk

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 19, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Khan, Fazal, Preserving Human Potential as Freedom: A Framework for Regulating Epigenetic Harms (May 1, 2010). Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, Forthcoming; UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1611865

Contact Information

Fazal Khan (Contact Author)
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
Athens, GA 30602
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 550
Downloads: 118
Download Rank: 137,749
Footnotes:  218

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.359 seconds