Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1613027
 
 

Footnotes (107)



 


 



Iqbal and Empathy


Darrell A. H. Miller


Duke University School of Law

May 15, 2010

University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 78, 2010
U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 10-25

Abstract:     
This Essay argues that empathy does and should play an important, albeit limited role, in a judge’s decision making process. Specifically, empathy is essential for making correct, principled, and unbiased judgments, because empathy is one of the few means we have to understand human motivation. Empathy is a crucial cognitive mechanism that can help compensate for common cognitive bias. As such, empathy, appropriately restricted, should be an accepted and meaningful tool for judges to use in evaluating the sufficiency of complaints, especially as they relate to Iqbal’s plausibility pleading standard.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: empathy, Iqbal, twombly, pleading, Sotomayor, jurisprudence, bias, cognitive, heuristics, behaviorism, economics

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 22, 2010 ; Last revised: June 15, 2010

Suggested Citation

Miller, Darrell A. H., Iqbal and Empathy (May 15, 2010). University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, Vol. 78, 2010; U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 10-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1613027

Contact Information

Darrell A. H. Miller (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 921
Downloads: 57
Download Rank: 210,143
Footnotes:  107

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds