Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1616840
 


 



The Application of Equal Protection to Prospective Jurors With Disabilities: Will Batson Cover Disability-Based Strikes


Mary A. Lynch


Albany Law School

1993

Albany Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 289, 1993

Abstract:     
It has been said that a case is decided once the jury is seated. In making peremptory strikes, the practitioner must make determinations based on simple questions and assumptions. But what about those prospective jurors with disabilities? How does deafness impact a juror’s ability to process evidence? Will a person with a disability have more empathy for a victim or defendant? Is there evidence that needs to be heard to be understood?

In Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), the Court applied the Equal Protection Clause to require prosecutors to give a race-neutral explanation for alleged purposeful racial discrimination in their use of peremptory strikes. Written just prior to the Court’s decision in J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994) (intentional discrimination based on gender in jury selection also violates equal protection) and in anticipation of the explosion of post-Batson inquiries about the context in which the Equal Protection Clause applies, this article explores the use of peremptory strikes to exclude jurors with disabilities as well as principles regarding discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges. The article argues that in Batson, the Court fashioned a new kind of Equal Protection analysis formed by the interplay of evolving concepts of law and changing cultural assumptions. Batson, therefore, the author argues should be extended beyond race to protect jurors with disabilities.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 75

Keywords: Equal Protection, jury, Batson v. Kentucky, disability

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 27, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Lynch, Mary A., The Application of Equal Protection to Prospective Jurors With Disabilities: Will Batson Cover Disability-Based Strikes (1993). Albany Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 289, 1993. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1616840

Contact Information

Mary A. Lynch (Contact Author)
Albany Law School ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 334
Downloads: 13

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.375 seconds