|
||||
|
||||
Will the Deflated WACC Please Stand Up? And the Real WACC Should Sit DownJoseph ThamDuke University - Duke Center for International Development in the Sanford School of Public Policy Ignacio Velez-ParejaMaster Consultores May 29, 2010 Cuadernos Latinoamericanos de Administración, Vol. VI No. 12, Julio- Diciembre 2011 Abstract: In a world with taxes, there is a small discrepancy between the deflated WACC WACCDef and the real wacc. This is due to the (1-T) term that is in the standard expression for the WACC applied to the Free Cash Flow (FCF). We compare different approaches for valuing nominal and real cash flows with the 1) nominal Weighted Average Cost of Capital, WACC, 2) real WACC, wacc, 3) inflated WACC, WACCInf and 4) deflated WACC, WACCDef. The cash flows are derived from financial statements that have been constructed in nominal prices. For consistency in valuation, we must use the deflated WACC rather than the real WACC to discount real cash flows, and the nominal WACC to discount nominal cash flows.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8 Keywords: Weighted Average Cost Of Capital, WACC, Firm Valuation, Capital Budgeting, Deflated WACC, Real WACC, Inflation JEL Classification: D61, G31, H43 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: May 29, 2010 ; Last revised: July 26, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.312 seconds