Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1619311
 
 

Footnotes (88)



 


 



Unilateral Refusals to Deal in Intellectual and Other Property


Howard A. Shelanski


Georgetown University

December 2, 2009

Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 76, No. 2, p. 369, 2009

Abstract:     
The recent trend in the federal courts has been to reduce the already limited potential antitrust liability faced by dominant firms that individually refuse to supply their rivals with goods or services the latter need to compete. However, important differences have emerged among courts in the extent to which they allow antitrust to reach refusals to supply property protected by intellectual property rights. Courts have differed over whether a firm’s unilateral refusal to supply a rival with IP should be judged under the Section 2 approach that applies to other (non-IP) property or instead should be exempted from normal antitrust scrutiny. Some circuit courts treat refusals to supply IP as susceptible to rule-of-reason inquiry under Section 2 of the Sherman Act whereas at least one court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, essentially exempts refusals to deal in IP from that antitrust inquiry. This article argues that neither economics nor IP policy considerations provide a sound basis for exempting refusals to supply IP from antitrust law’s general liability standard for unilateral refusals to deal. Where antitrust enforcement treats IP deferentially, it should be because in a particular case there is a link between IP and the innovation and competition considerations that in most cases weigh against antitrust mandates to deal in any property. Sometimes those factors will be magnified where IP is at stake; but they are not so systematically different for intellectual property that refusals to supply IP should be exempted from the antitrust standard applicable to other property.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 2, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Shelanski, Howard A., Unilateral Refusals to Deal in Intellectual and Other Property (December 2, 2009). Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 76, No. 2, p. 369, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1619311

Contact Information

Howard A. Shelanski (Contact Author)
Georgetown University ( email )
Washington, DC 20057
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 728
Downloads: 240
Download Rank: 74,016
Footnotes:  88

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds