Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1619841
 
 

Footnotes (336)



 


 



Redistricting and Discriminatory Purpose


Michael J. Pitts


Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

June 3, 2010

American University Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 1575, 2010

Abstract:     
State and local governments covered by the preclearance provision in Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act will soon be submitting their redistricting plans to the federal government (most often the United States Attorney General) for approval. The Attorney General can deny preclearance to a redistricting plan by finding that the plan violates Section 5’s discriminatory purpose standard. Currently, no detailed framework has been developed for determining when a redistricting plan fails to satisfy the discriminatory purpose standard. This Article fills that void by proposing such a framework - one built from judicial opinions, statutory language, legislative history, executive branch enforcement, and “politics as markets” theory. In addition, this Article argues that development of a manageable framework for enforcing the discriminatory purpose standard in the redistricting context is necessary in order to satisfy a Supreme Court that in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder (2009) expressed deep skepticism about the future constitutional viability of Section 5.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 86

Keywords: Voting Rights Act, Section 5, Preclearance, Redistricting, Discriminatory Purpose, Attorney General, Voting Rights, Politics As Markets

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 3, 2010 ; Last revised: February 18, 2012

Suggested Citation

Pitts, Michael J., Redistricting and Discriminatory Purpose (June 3, 2010). American University Law Review, Vol. 59, p. 1575, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1619841

Contact Information

Michael J. Pitts (Contact Author)
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 758
Downloads: 99
Download Rank: 160,990
Footnotes:  336

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds