Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1619997
 
 

Footnotes (88)



 


 



What’s Wrong with Qualified Immunity?


John C. Jeffries Jr.


University of Virginia School of Law


Florida Law Review, Vol. 62, 2010
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2010-21

Abstract:     
Originally delivered as the Dunwody Lecture at the University of Florida, this paper argues that “qualified immunity needs a course correction.” The Supreme Court’s attempt to strike a balance between the “importance of a damages remedy to protect the rights of citizens” and the “public interest in encouraging the vigorous exercise of official authority” (Harlow v. Fitzgerald) may have seemed sensible in the abstract, but has broken down in administration. Today, the law of qualified immunity is complicated, unstable, and overprotective of government officers. This paper documents those defects and proposes reforms designed to “get constitutional tort law back on track.”

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 4, 2010 ; Last revised: June 17, 2010

Suggested Citation

Jeffries Jr., John C., What’s Wrong with Qualified Immunity?. Florida Law Review, Vol. 62, 2010 ; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2010-21. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1619997

Contact Information

John C. Jeffries (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-3436 (Phone)
434-924-7536 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 809
Downloads: 203
Download Rank: 83,007
Footnotes:  88

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.594 seconds