Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1621876
 
 

Footnotes (192)



 


 



A High Likelihood of Confusion: Wal-mart, TrafFix, Moseley, and Dastar – The Supreme Court's New Trademark Jurisprudence


Sheldon W. Halpern


Albany Law School

2005

New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 61, No. 237, 2005

Abstract:     
This article analyzes the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros., Inc., TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Mktg. Displays, Inc., Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., and Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. in relation to their impact on trademark law. While each arose in very different contexts, the entirety of the case law indicates a significant reversal of the previous expansion of the nature and scope of the federal trademark protection. The article argues that the Court is moving toward consumer-related concerns as opposed to protecting property rights. The Court appears to be particularly concerned with marking and respecting the boundaries separating copyright, patent, and trademark law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 7, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Halpern, Sheldon W., A High Likelihood of Confusion: Wal-mart, TrafFix, Moseley, and Dastar – The Supreme Court's New Trademark Jurisprudence (2005). New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 61, No. 237, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1621876

Contact Information

Sheldon W. W. Halpern (Contact Author)
Albany Law School ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States
614-599-1118 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 245
Downloads: 54
Download Rank: 225,947
Footnotes:  192
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds