Footnotes (143)



Reading between the (Blood) Lines

Rose Cuison Villazor

University of California, Davis

May 7, 2010

Southern California Law Review, Vol. 83, p. 473, 2010

Legal scholars and historians have depicted the rule of hypodescent - that "one drop" of African blood categorized one as Black - as one of the powerful ways that law and society deployed to construct racial identities and deny equal citizenship. Ariela J. Gross's new book, "What Blood Won't Tell: A History of Race on Trial in America," boldly complicates the dominant narrative about hypodescent rules in legal scholarship. On the one hand, "What Blood Won't Tell" argues that the legal and social construction of race was far more complex, flexible and subject to manipulation than the scholarship regarding the rules about blood distinctions has suggested. On the other hand, "What Blood Won't Tell" highlights circumstances, both historically and in recent memory, of the ways in which blood distinctions played crucial roles in shaping the identity of people of color, including indigenous peoples. Importantly, "What Blood Won't Tell" also examines how blood quantum rules relate to contemporary efforts to reassert indigenous peoples' sovereignty and claims to lands.

This Review highlights the important contributions of "What Blood Won't Tell" to our understanding of the racial experience of indigenous peoples and the contemporary methods used to remedy the present-day effects of indigenous peoples' colonial experience. "What Blood Won't Tell" advances a more robust account of the racialization of people of color through rules about blood differences in at least three ways. First, it places the colonial experience of indigenous peoples within the larger historical contexts of racial subordination and efforts to promote White domination and privilege. Second, it underscores the federal government's ongoing responsibility to counteract the long-standing effects of its past misdeeds by addressing indigenous peoples' unresolved claims to lands that have been stolen from them. Third, it allows us to take a careful look at the relationship between blood quantum rules and the right of indigenous peoples to exercise self-determination. Taken together, these three perspectives reveal the immense challenges inherent to remedying the long-term effects of the racialization and colonization of indigenous peoples.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: Race, Blood Quantum, Property, Indigeneity

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 9, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Villazor, Rose Cuison, Reading between the (Blood) Lines (May 7, 2010). Southern California Law Review, Vol. 83, p. 473, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1622009

Contact Information

Rose Cuison Villazor (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis ( email )
One Shields Avenue
Davis, CA 95616
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 771
Downloads: 99
Download Rank: 179,973
Footnotes:  143

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds