|
||||
|
||||
Managing the Miombo Woodlands of Southern Africa: Policies, Incentives and Options for the Rural PoorPeter A. DeweesAgriculture and Rural Development Department, World Bank Bruce CampbellConsultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Yemi KaterereUnited Nations - UN-REDD Programme Almeida SitoeEduardo Mondlane University (UEM) - Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry, Department of Forestry A. Cunninghamaffiliation not provided to SSRN Arild AngelsenCIFOR, Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta - CIFOR, Center for International Forestry Research, Cameroon; Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB) - Department of Economics and Resource Management Sven WunderCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) January 1, 2010 Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 57–73, January 2010 Abstract: Miombo woodlands cover vast areas of southern Africa. Of comparatively little interest for export-oriented commercial logging, they are part of a complex system of rural land use that integrates woodland management with crops and livestock. There is also evidence that woodland resources are extensively used for household consumption, greatly reducing the risk of households falling deeper into poverty as a result of environmental or economic stress. New opportunities for improving the management of miombo woodlands, with poverty mitigation in mind, suggest four policy options. First, communities are becoming more active in managing local natural resources, a result of decentralization and land reforms, which suggests that there may be good scope for strengthening related policy and legal frameworks and the measures to implement them. Second, new and integrated conservation-development approaches are emerging, which suggests possible scope for providing payments for environmental services to increase the value of managed woodlands. Third, markets throughout the region are developing and expanding, which suggests great scope for enhancing forest-based markets by removing restrictive legislation and by supporting local producers and forest enterprises. Fourth, all these opportunities suggest that public forest institutions can be revitalized by strengthening their service delivery orientations, with poverty mitigation as a main objective.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17 Keywords: dry woodlands, miombo, poverty, policy JEL Classification: D61, E61, N57, Q23 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: June 9, 2010 ; Last revised: June 17, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.407 seconds