Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1622885
 
 

References (5)



 
 

Citations (7)



 


 



Liquidity Level or Liquidity Risk? Evidence from the Financial Crisis


Xiaoxia Lou


University of Delaware - Alfred Lerner College of Business and Economics

Ronnie Sadka


Boston College - Carroll School of Management

October 25, 2010


Abstract:     
This paper distinguishes between a stock's liquidity (liquidity level), as measured by the average cost of trading it, and its liquidity beta (liquidity risk), as measured by the covariation of its return with unexpected changes in aggregate liquidity. Although considered safe assets in general, liquid stocks underperformed illiquid stocks during the financial crisis of 2008--2009. The performance of stocks during the crisis can be better explained by their historical liquidity betas. These findings therefore highlight the importance of accounting for both liquidity level and liquidity risk in risk-management applications.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: Liquidity risk, Liquidity Level, Asset pricing, Risk Management, Financial Crisis

JEL Classification: G12, G14, G23

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 9, 2010 ; Last revised: February 1, 2013

Suggested Citation

Lou, Xiaoxia and Sadka, Ronnie, Liquidity Level or Liquidity Risk? Evidence from the Financial Crisis (October 25, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1622885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1622885

Contact Information

Xiaoxia Lou (Contact Author)
University of Delaware - Alfred Lerner College of Business and Economics ( email )
Newark, DE 19716
United States
Ronnie Sadka
Boston College - Carroll School of Management ( email )
140 Commonwealth Avenue
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,069
Downloads: 1,361
Download Rank: 6,791
References:  5
Citations:  7

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.469 seconds