|
||||
|
||||
Inefficiency of Leveraged/Inverse ETFsMichael C. I. Nwoguguaffiliation not provided to SSRN February 20, 2012 Abstract: While synthetic funds, synthetics ETF and Leveraged/Inverse ETFs have grown in popularity during then last ten years, there are many structural problems inherent in the legal/economic structure of these ETFs and funds. These problems raise actionable issues of “Suitability” and “fraud” under US securities laws, because the advertised terms of most Leveraged/Inverse ETFs and some Synthetic ETFs are mis-leading, and these ETFs have substantial tracking errors. This article contributes to the existing literature by: a) critiquing the structure of synthetics funds/ETFs and Leveraged/Inverse ETFs, b) explaining the biases and effects inherent in Leveraged/Inverse ETFs such as the tracking errors and the downward drift in returns of Leveraged/Inverse ETFs, c) showing how Put Call Parity Theorem affects the accuracy of these funds/ETFs; d) analyzing “Suitability” issues.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22 Keywords: portfolio management, risk management, Indices; Put-Call Parity, ICAPM, complexity working papers seriesDate posted: June 13, 2010 ; Last revised: June 11, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.610 seconds