Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1624253
 
 

Footnotes (266)



 


 



Prescribing Orthodoxy


Kelly Sarabyn


affiliation not provided to SSRN

April 26, 2010

Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal, Vol. 8, p. 367, 2010

Abstract:     
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, the Court famously held that no state could prescribe an ideological orthodoxy. Yet more than sixty years later, the constitutional doctrines governing that proscription are in disarray. This article argues that Barnette’s proscription should be understood as banning the state from intentionally utilizing non-rational methods to purposely shape citizens’ ideological beliefs. After espousing this theory, the article will examine the unconstitutional condition and government speech doctrines, and demonstrate how a constitutional principle banning the prescription of orthodoxy provides them with a much-needed coherence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: Orthodoxy, Liberty, Right of Private Conscience, First Amendment, Government Speech, Unconstitutional Conditions

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 13, 2010 ; Last revised: June 22, 2010

Suggested Citation

Sarabyn, Kelly, Prescribing Orthodoxy (April 26, 2010). Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal, Vol. 8, p. 367, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1624253

Contact Information

Kelly Sarabyn (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 344
Downloads: 41
Footnotes:  266

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.282 seconds