Abstract

 
 

References (44)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



US Trade and Wages: The Misleading Implications of Conventional Trade Theory


Robert Z. Lawrence


Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Lawrence Edwards


University of Cape Town (UCT)

June 14, 2010

Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper No. 10-9

Abstract:     
Conventional trade theory, which combines the Heckscher-Ohlin theory and the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, implies that expanded trade between developed and developing countries will increase wage equality in the former. This theory is widely applied. It serves as the basis for estimating the impact of trade on wages using two-sector simulation models and the net factor content of trade. It leads naturally to the presumption that the rapid growth and declining relative prices of US manufactured imports from developing countries since the 1990s have been a powerful source of increased US wage inequality.

In this study we present evidence that suggests the presumption is not warranted. We highlight the sensitivity of conventional theory to the assumption of incomplete specialization and find evidence that is not consistent with it. Since 1987, although US domestic relative effective prices in industries with relatively high shares of manufactured goods imports from developing countries have declined, effective unskilled worker-weighted prices have actually risen relative to skilled worker-weighted prices. If anything, this suggests pressures for increased wage equality. Also in apparent contradiction to theory, the (six-digit North American Industry Classification System [NAICS]) US manufacturing industries with high shares of manufactured imports from developing countries are actually more skill intensive than the industries with high shares of imports from developed countries. Finally, applying a two-stage regression procedure, we find that developing-country import price changes have not mandated increased US wage inequality. While these results conflict with standard theory, they are easily explained if the United States and developing countries have specialized in products and tasks that are highly imperfect substitutes. If this is the case, the impact of increased trade with developing countries on US wage inequality is far more muted than standard theory suggests. Also methodologies such as the net factor content of trade using US production coefficients and simulation models assuming perfect substitution between imports and domestic products could be highly misleading.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Wages, Trade Theory

JEL Classification: F11, F16, J30

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 14, 2010 ; Last revised: January 27, 2011

Suggested Citation

Lawrence, Robert Z. and Edwards, Lawrence, US Trade and Wages: The Misleading Implications of Conventional Trade Theory (June 14, 2010). Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper No. 10-9. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1624879 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1624879

Contact Information

Robert Z. Lawrence (Contact Author)
Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) ( email )
79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-495-1118 (Phone)
617 496 2850 (Fax)
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Lawrence Edwards
University of Cape Town (UCT) ( email )
Private Bag
Rondebosch, 7701
South Africa
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 239
Downloads: 32
References:  44
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.375 seconds