Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1625682
 
 

Footnotes (84)



 


 



CEDAW, the Bible and the State of the Netherlands: The Struggle Over Orthodox Women’s Political Participation and Their Responses


Barbara M. Oomen


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Joost Guijt


affiliation not provided to SSRN

Matthias Ploeg


affiliation not provided to SSRN

June 2010

Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 158-174, June 2010

Abstract:     
The case of the SGP essentially concerned the question whether the Netherlands should take measures against a Bible-based political party that bars women from its list of candidates. Against the theoretical background of human rights sociology, the rise of rights as a framework for moral discussions and the role of NGOs in rights implementation, this article assesses how ‘rights talk’, in particular based upon the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), became the language in which the discussion over orthodox women’s political rights came to be framed in the Netherlands. It makes use of extensive quantitative and qualitative data to assess how this particular form of rights realization – via court cases lodged by outside NGOs – impacted upon discussions within the communities concerned, particularly amongst the women themselves. It argues that this particular form of rights realization can also have undesired effects, such as reinforcing more conservative positions and strengthening a general sense of isolation from society and relates these findings to more general discussions on ‘talking rights’ in a context of religious diversity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: human rights sociology, religious diversity, CEDAW, NGOs, legal pluralism

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 18, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Oomen, Barbara M. and Guijt, Joost and Ploeg, Matthias, CEDAW, the Bible and the State of the Netherlands: The Struggle Over Orthodox Women’s Political Participation and Their Responses (June 2010). Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 158-174, June 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1625682

Contact Information

Barbara M. Oomen (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Joost Guijt
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Matthias Ploeg
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 311
Downloads: 33
Footnotes:  84

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds