Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1625978
 
 

Footnotes (265)



 


 



Beyond Case Reporters: Using Newspapers to Supplement the Legal-Historical Record


Jeremy Patrick


University of Southern Queensland School of Law

June 16, 2010

Drexel Law Review, Vol. 3, p. 539, 2011

Abstract:     
Judicial opinions selected for inclusion in case law reporters are only a small fraction of the universe of legal materials that may provide insight into the history of how legal concepts work in practice. This article examines a neglected source of information: newspaper archives, many of which are becoming available in full-text electronic databases. This article argues that newspapers are a valuable supplement and corrective to legal research performed through traditional means. It includes a test case of how research on a discrete legal topic (Canada's prohibition on blasphemous libel) turns up very different results in newspaper archives compared to case reporters.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: Newspapers, Blasphemy, Blasphemous Libel, Case Reporters

JEL Classification: K10, K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 17, 2010 ; Last revised: May 16, 2011

Suggested Citation

Patrick, Jeremy, Beyond Case Reporters: Using Newspapers to Supplement the Legal-Historical Record (June 16, 2010). Drexel Law Review, Vol. 3, p. 539, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1625978

Contact Information

Jeremy J. Patrick (Contact Author)
University of Southern Queensland School of Law ( email )
Room Q-416
USQ
Toowoomba, QLD 4350
Australia
+61 7 4631 5374 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://legalheresy.blogspot.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 709
Downloads: 127
Download Rank: 135,365
Footnotes:  265

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds