|
||||
|
||||
An Informational Perspective on Administrative Procedures
Rui J.P. De Figueiredo Jr. University of California, Berkeley - Business & Public Policy Group Pablo T. Spiller University of California, Berkeley - Business & Public Policy Group Santiago Urbiztondo National University of La Plata and FIEL, Argentin Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 15, No. 1, Spring 1999 Abstract: A number of scholars have identified the important role administrative procedures have in ?structuring? the interest group environment of government agencies: determining who can participate an in what manner. Using a formal model, we analyze the incentives and outcomes that different procedural -- and therefore interest group -- environments generate. The model yields a number of important conclusions. First, because elected officials are concerned not only about distributional rents, but also informational ones, the use of procedures in some cases will result in worse outcomes for political principals on the policy dimension. Officials will be willing to bear the losses in exchange for informational gains. Second, under certain conditions, a politician is better off with a biased group monitoring the agency rather than a neutral one, since biased groups will subsidize a portion of the monitoring cost. Third, having multiple interest groups, including one in opposition to the politician, makes the political principal strictly better off than any other constellation of monitors, since competing interest groups will provide the greatest information at the lowest cost to the elected official. Accepted Paper Series Date posted: May 25, 1999 ; Last revised: November 14, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.141 seconds.