Abstract

 
 

References (31)



 


 



Do We Follow Others When We Should Outside the Lab? Evidence from the AP Top 25


Daniel F. Stone


Bowdoin College - Department of Economics

Basit Zafar


Federal Reserve Bank of New York

June 1, 2012

FRB of New York Staff Report No. 453

Abstract:     
We use data from the Associated Press U.S. college football poll to analyze the ex-post optimality of social learning in a non-lab setting. The poll is a weekly subjective ranking of the top 25 teams, voted on by over 60 sports journalists. The aggregate ranks are publicly observable each week before voters update their personal ranks, so voters can potentially learn from their peers. Our results indicate that, while voters do learn from their peers to some extent, the informativeness of peer ranks appears to be under-valued.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Social Learning, Conformity, Herding, Peers, Networks

JEL Classification: D80, D83, D84

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 22, 2010 ; Last revised: June 27, 2012

Suggested Citation

Stone, Daniel F. and Zafar, Basit, Do We Follow Others When We Should Outside the Lab? Evidence from the AP Top 25 (June 1, 2012). FRB of New York Staff Report No. 453. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1628136 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628136

Contact Information

Daniel F. Stone
Bowdoin College - Department of Economics ( email )
Brunswick, ME 04011
United States
6463387833 (Phone)
Basit Zafar (Contact Author)
Federal Reserve Bank of New York ( email )
33 Liberty Street
New York, NY 10045
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 634
Downloads: 61
Download Rank: 182,228
References:  31

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds