The Constitutionality of the Taxation Consequences for Renouncing U.S. Citizenship
William Thomas Worster
The Hague University of Applied Sciences - International Law; University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for International Law
June 22, 2010
Florida Tax Review, Vol. 9, No. 11, 2010
Individuals that renounce their U.S. citizenship are held to a special taxation regime as a consequence for their expatriation that is unique in the world and, this article will argue, unconstitutional. Originally, renunciation of citizenship was seen as the ultimate income tax reduction device, but this option has now lost much of its attractiveness as Congress has passed “exit tax” provisions that impose a tax liability on individuals who have renounced U.S. citizenship similar to that imposed on U.S. citizens.
This article will argue that, as it currently stands, the exit tax is not constitutional because it is not narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest and must be judged at that standard because it infringes on the fundamental right to expatriate and discriminates based on national origin.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 100
Keywords: citizenship, nationality, tax, taxation, renunciation, renounce, expat, expatriate, expatriation, constitution, constitutionality, unconstitutional, fundmental, right, national, original, discrimination, exit tax
JEL Classification: K34, K33, K39, K30, K10, K40, K49, K00
Date posted: June 24, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds