Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1628813
 
 

References (29)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews: Analyzing Supreme Court Nominee Evasiveness, 1955-2009


Dion Farganis


Elon University - Political Science

Justin Wedeking


University of Kentucky - Department of Political Science

June 22, 2010


Abstract:     
Criticism of Supreme Court confirmation hearings has intensified considerably over the past two decades. In particular, there is a growing sense that nominees are now less forthcoming and that the hearings have suffered as a result. In this paper, we challenge that conventional wisdom. Based on a comprehensive content analysis of every question and answer in all of the modern confirmation hearings, we find only a mild decline in the candor of recent nominees. Moreover, we find that senators ask more probing questions than in the past, and that nominees are now more explicit when they refuse to respond – two factors that may be fueling the perception that evasiveness has increased in recent years. We close with a discussion of the normative implications of our findings as well as an outline for future research.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: supreme court, confirmation hearings, supreme court nominees, supreme court justices, judiciary committee, content analysis

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 23, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Farganis, Dion and Wedeking, Justin, No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews: Analyzing Supreme Court Nominee Evasiveness, 1955-2009 (June 22, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1628813 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628813

Contact Information

Dion Farganis (Contact Author)
Elon University - Political Science ( email )
Gray Pavillion
Elon, NC 27244
United States
Justin Wedeking
University of Kentucky - Department of Political Science ( email )
1615 Patterson Office Tower
University of Kentucky
Lexington, KY 40506-0027
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,269
Downloads: 245
Download Rank: 71,823
References:  29
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds